Regarding the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Act that abolishes the prosecutor's right to supplementary investigation, the Supreme Court said, "It is a matter to be decided from a legislative policy perspective," but said, "There is a need to prepare sufficient supplementary measures to prevent side effects." This is the first time that the Supreme Court's Court Administration has expressed an opinion regarding the existence of supplementary investigation rights. The National Court Administration announced on the 12th that it submitted a review opinion containing the above contents to the National Assembly regarding the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Act recently proposed by Rep. Kim Yong-min of the Democratic Party of Korea and Rep. Park Eun-jeong of the Cho Kuk Innovation Party. However, he expressed his opinion in favor of the amendment that allows the court to decide on ‘conditional release’ when issuing an arrest warrant. The Ministry of Public Administration and Security said, “It appears that this will be able to improve the misconception that ‘arrest is punishment’ and resolve the abnormal situation in which the focus of criminal justice is concentrated on the warrant stage and important trials receive no attention.” They also expressed support for the introduction of a judicial pre-examination procedure for search and seizure warrants. On the other hand, whether the prosecutor's indictment is appropriate is