The Federal Supreme Court (STF) began this Wednesday (10) the judgment of the appeals presented by the platforms that operate social networks against the Court's decision that recognized the responsibility of big techs for the illegal posts made by their users. Today's session was dedicated to the first part of the vote by Minister Dias Toffoli, rapporteur of one of the judged cases. Related news: STF judges appeals against holding big techs accountable. Decree determines that big techs must prevent criminal content. Toffoli's demonstration should be finalized in this Thursday's session (11). Then, the other ministers will give their votes. One of the points discussed during today's session was the rule that requires internet content providers to maintain their headquarters and legal representative in the country. Toffoli questioned the need to maintain the obligation for providers that do not carry out economic activity, such as Wikipedia. The minister said he is open to debate the issue.  "Consideration is necessary. Wikipedia has to have a headquarters, doesn't it? What today doesn't have an economic exploitation, it will have tomorrow", he stated. Then, Minister Alexandre de Moraes said that internet crimes are also committed on non-profit websites. According to the minister, if the company is not headquartered in the country, the courts will not be able to control any illegal acts. "The reality of big tech, social networks, we see that it is not just economic issues that have been overflowing, it is mainly an ideological issue of political domination, influence in elections in other countries", stated Moraes. The plenary will judge appeals requesting clarification on the Court's decision. The appeals were filed by Facebook and Google.  The platforms' resources ask for a deadline for implementing the rules defined during the trial or for the application of the rules to be guaranteed only after the plenary decision has become final.